Not a Tango, nothing to see here

August 23, 2012

Harvard: Gun Control is counterproductive

Filed under: 2A, guns, rights, self-defense — antitango @ 12:28 pm

I think Linoge would approve!

The study, which just appeared in Volume 30, Number 2 of the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy (pp. 649-694), set out to answer the question in its title: “Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide? A Review of International and Some Domestic Evidence.” Contrary to conventional wisdom, and the sniffs of our more sophisticated and generally anti-gun counterparts across the pond, the answer is “no.” And not just no, as in there is no correlation between gun ownership and violent crime, but an emphatic no, showing a negative correlation: as gun ownership increases, murder and suicide decreases.

The PDF is linked below.  Most excellent read! (PDF warning)

A second misconception about the relationship between firearms and violence attributes Europe’s generally low homicide rates to stringent gun control. That attribution cannot be accurate since murder in Europe was at an all‐time low before the gun controls were introduced.13 For instance, virtually the only English gun control during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries was the practice that police patrolled without guns.  During this period gun control prevailed far less in England or Europe than in certain American states which nevertheless had—and continue to have—murder rates that were and are comparatively very high.

Oh, this is juicy.

H/T to Joe Huffman for pointing out that this is *NOT* a recent article, but was published on May 5, 2007.


  1. That isn’t exactly a new publication. It came out in the spring of 2007.

    Comment by Joe Huffman — August 23, 2012 @ 12:56 pm

  2. […] Tango I came across this wonderful study done by Harvard in 2007.  Lately I have reiterated more and more that our […]

    Pingback by Denial - It's their current state... - The Minuteman — August 23, 2012 @ 2:08 pm

  3. Reblogged this on The Grey Enigma.

    Comment by The Grey Enigma — September 3, 2012 @ 4:20 pm

  4. This paper is not ‘done by Harvard’, it’s a student-run, non peer reviewed journal, written by one current professor and one retired professor, neither of whom had anything to do with Harvard.

    Comment by John — January 11, 2013 @ 8:20 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at